- Configuring an ESP8266 for Battery PowerPosted 2 days ago
- Creating a Telegram Bot for ESP32Posted 3 days ago
- Mini Course on BlynkPosted 4 days ago
- Creating a Unique Electronic Musical Instrument: The Sound WallPosted 6 days ago
- Building a Laser MicroscopePosted 6 days ago
- Grand Piano Keys with ArduinoPosted 1 week ago
- Wireless Power TransferPosted 1 week ago
- Robot Punchers with ArduinoPosted 2 weeks ago
- A minimal 3D-printed scalePosted 2 weeks ago
- Expanding the pins of a microcontrollerPosted 2 weeks ago
Interview with Fred Trotter on Open Source Health. Be inspired for your next project!
When Open Source and e-health unite, something really interesting can happen. If you’re thinking about your next project, maybe you should care about some good advices from Fred Trotter, a serial entrepreneur on the open source meditech field. Here is an interesting interview reported by Opensource.com:
Fred Trotter is a frequent speaker at OSCON and was recently a panelist at the SXSW MedTech Conference, which is where I caught up with him to ask about his passion for open source and health care related data.
I’ve known Fred for about 15 years or so, first as a contributor to OpenEMR and later we accidentally met in person at the University of Texas. It’s pretty cool to come face-to-face with folks you’ve only know online and, mostly, from working with their contributed code! Over the years, Fred has hosted a couple of open source healthcare IT conferences and done some great work in the field for ClearHealth/MirrorMed with Dave Ulhman and now focusing on open data.
How long have you been involved with open source?
I was involved with open source ever since my first job, which was about 15 years ago. My second job was with Rackspace back when it was a much smaller company, and of course Rackspace was one of the pioneers with Linux. I worked in Internet security before I focused on health IT, and I was an enthusiast for open source there too. So, I have been involved in and supporting open source, and open source has been supporting me back for my entire professional career.
Where do you see free and open source software headed? Specifically in the heath IT area?
It’s hard to say. Generally, health IT has been surprisingly unwilling to deeply support open source software. Despite the huge successes, starting all the way back with VA VistA, for FOSS in health IT, it still struggles for respect, adoption, and consistent funding. This is why I am excited to work for Open Source Health, Inc. (OSH) which is committed to funding critical projects.
What are your views on how people can get involved at a level where they can make a living off of it?
I think the answer to this question is very difficult for open source generally and open source health IT. Dual licensing, open source, and other models have really proven themselves in the not healthcare software marketplace. But if you are in healthcare, I would focus more closely on the business case you are addressing. I have seen good open source projects languish in health IT, and I have seen just OK projects really take off because they focused on a real healthcare need. The temptation in healthcare is to try and start a business that makes healthcare into what it “should” be. That is suicide for health IT business plans. You need to find a way to change the world for the better and get paid well under a three party (payer, patient, provider) economic system that dominates in the U.S. Find a business plan that works first, and then work from there.
Anything you would like to add?
One of the things we touched on a bit was sustainability. The software ecosystem really depends on open source. Open source projects really are infrastructure for synthetic thinking and the artificial intelligence of the network as a whole. But we still have important projects, like OpenSSL, that struggle for funding. We see what happens when our infrastructure fails us with problems like heartbleed.
In health IT, I think the industry has still not really figured out that at least some of the software really needs to be infrastructure, and by having proprietary systems where we should have open source solutions instead, we end up with what amounts to a toll bridge infrastructure model, which is a great model if you own the toll bridge. I think there will be a huge opportunity for open source health IT after meaningful use dollars are gone, as providers realize that EHR vendors (et al) want to be continually paid meaningful use level dollars, so we will see.
Read the full interview: Interview with Fred Trotter Open Source Health, Inc. | Opensource.com